Legal Opinion

MATTHEW BURNSIDE v. ARKANSAS JUDiCIAL DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 2021Published

1Opinion of the Court

Digitally signed by Susan Williams Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Cite as

2021 Ark. 147

Date: 2023.06.20 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS 15:04:16 -05'00' No. CV-21-135 Opinion Delivered: June 17, 2021 MATTHEW BURNSIDE PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS V. ARKANSAS JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY COMMISSION RESPONDENT PETITION DENIED. ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice Petitioner Matthew Burnside, proceeding pro se, petitions to proceed in forma pauperis with respect to a petition for writ of certiorari tendered to this court. We deny the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boles v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Partin v. Bar of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Perroni v. SacharSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Brock v. Pilot Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  5. Russell Berger v. Bill Bryant, Director, Arkansas State PoliceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API