Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. Harrist

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating tlie ease as above).

Plaintiff in error insists the judgment is erroneous, in that the evidence did not warrant a finding against it on account of any of the items of damage claimed by defendant in error, and particularly did not warrant a finding of damages against it on account of the killing of the hog. The contention is overruled. The evidence was plainly sufficient to support the findings of the jury as to all the damages awarded to defendant in error by the judgment, unless it was not sufficient to support the findings on which the award of $50 on account of…