Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Sinistorie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding for substitution of attorneys for the plaintiff in a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, the original attorney for the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 19, 1962, granting on reargument plaintiff’s motion to substitute another attorney, insofar as such order: (1) directed, in its fifth decretal paragraph, that the original *1075attorney shall have a lien in a dollar amount, based on quantum meruit, upon any recovery in the action; (2) failed to direct, instead, that such attorney…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Madison v. Spancrete Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API