Cross v. State

MORROW, Judge.

The conviction is for vagrancy upon an information containing various counts, among them, that the appellant was a common prostitute, that she was a keeper of a house of prostitution.

There is legitimate and sufficient direct evidence to support the finding of the jury that she, was a common prostitute, that is, one who promiscuously submitted her person to the use of men for pay.

There are bills of exceptions reserved to the admission of evidence that the house kept by the appellant bore the general reputation of a house of ill-fame. The proposition that the fact that appellant…