Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order granting plaintiff’s motion to examine defendant as an adverse party, by the operator of its street car, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Section 289 of the Civil Practice Act contemplates examination of defendant by employees who are such at the time of the examination, and if the relationship does not then exist, the court is without power to direct examination of the defendant as an adverse party through such a former employee. (McGowan v. Eastman, 271 N. Y. 195.)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGowan v. EastmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Mars Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rutherford v. Albany Medical Center HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Vogel v. Benwil Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Green Point Savings Bank v. Central Gardens Unit No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API