Legal Opinion

DAYWALT v. SAUL

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 19, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00277Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ALAH DAYWALT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:20CV277 ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant.1 ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff, Alah Daywalt, brought this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”) to obtain judicial review of a final decision of Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). (Docket Entry 1.) Defendant has filed the certified…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Bradley Lewis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API