Welton v. Palmer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth District, City and. 'County of San Francisco. Judgment was rendered in the Court below upon a demurs rer to the complaint. • ■ The other facts are stated in the opinion. .
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, C. J.
After a careful consideration of the arguments of counsel for plaintiffs, we cannot resist the conclusion that the complaint is defective in several particulars. It is alleged in the complaint that the deed to George Brown was void, *457because both trustees did not unite in the deed; because the execution of the deed, by Elizabeth S. Welton—-the cestui que trust—was without legal acknowledgment; because it was made without' her approbation, or request in writing, and because it was in violation of the trust; and the plaintiff’s counsel repeat, that the deed was void on its face, and say that no…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Walke & Wife v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Learned v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Butler v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872