Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Hartford Dredging Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 17, 1900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Action to recover damages for injury to the plaintiff’s oyster-ground caused by the dumping of mud thereon, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County and heard in damages to the court, Curtis, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $637, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court.

Read the full summary

Action to recover damages for injury to the plaintiff’s oyster-ground caused by the dumping of mud thereon, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County and heard in damages to the court, Curtis, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $637, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. In November, 1895, the defendant, under proper authority, was engaged in cutting a channel in Stamford harbor, and while towing one of its scows, which was loaded with mud dug from said channel, over the oyster-bed of the plaintiff, the scow…

1Opinion of the CourtTorrahce, J.

' The plaintiff had but one cause of action and should have stated that in a single count; there was not the slightest necessity for stating it in four separate counts. Craft Refrigerating Machine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co., 63 Conn. 551; Goodrich v. Stanton, 71 id. 418, 424; Brown v. Wilcox, 73 id. 100.

'The first count alleged that the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of certain described oyster-grounds in Stamford harbor, but did not allege that they had been lawfully designated by the proper authority; and mainly for failing to allege such designation the defendant demurred. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Bunnell v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  5. Broughel v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. State v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Mei v. Alterman Transport Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Neff v. NeffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Thomas v. GanezerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API