In re the Estate of Wishart
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
A novel and interesting composite question of abatement and marshaling is presented by the case at bar. Testatrix’s will was executed on May 3, 1930, but by codicil bearing date July 29, 1931, she effected various alterations in the original testamentary provisions. In both instruments every single item of the property which she owned at the time of her death" was made the subject of a specific gift.
It has been estimated that her funeral and testamentary expenses and debts will aggregate approximately $4,200, and the question of abatement arises by reason of the fact that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Estate of SmallmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Estate of DevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of HarbeckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Estate of TopazioNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Accounting of DowdNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Estate of FerraraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of LunneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co. v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.