Cosgrove v. Provident Institution for Savings
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 39.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, J.
This writ of error is brought to review the judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming a judgment of the Hudson Circuit Court in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action brought by them to recover a balance alleged to be due upon their deposit account with the defendant savings institution.
The only question in dispute between the parties was as to the effect of a payment of $150, made to an unknown woman who presented the bank-book of the plaintiffs at the defendant’s banking-house, and on the representation that she was *654the plaintiff Maty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Appleby v. . Erie County Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Smith v. . Brooklyn Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Schoenwald v. . Metropolitan Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Goldrick v. Bristol County Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Eaves v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forbes v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Reinhardt v. Passaic-Clifton Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Langdale v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Polonsky v. Union Federal Savings & Loan AssociationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- The Commercial Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.