Legal Opinion

Vanderstolph v. Boylan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari. "Writ quashed.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

This writ of certiorari is brought to vacate certain proceedings to lay out a highway, and the plaintiff’s title to prosecute it consists only in his being a tax-payer of the town, and so, potentially liable for some, as yet unknown, but very small, portion of the tax wherewith to pay the appraised damage of $275. We think this interest is too remote and too indirect and indefinite to warrant this remedy, and that any sanction of the proceeding would be an improper exercise of discretion. Were no other ■objection apparent, the single circumstance that the record contains no evidence of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campau v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sampson v. Commissioners of HighwaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  2. Lord v. County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  3. Board of Education v. GillelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API