Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wolosin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 13, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

In this final accounting objections have been filed by the widow, the effect of which is to disagree with the petitioners’ computation of the widow’s share.

*583The will, dated October 10, 1958 provided as follows:

“ first: I direct the payment of my just debts and burial expenses.
“ second: I give and bequeath and devise one-third (%) of my estate to my wife, sarah wolosin.

‘ ‘ third : All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate both real and personal or mixed property, I give, bequeath and devise to my children, anna w. bass, fannie w. paley and ida w. Roberts, to share and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PetroffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  2. In re the Intermediate Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SkidellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  2. Thompson v. National Newark & Essex BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API