King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
At the time of writing the original opinion, the charter provisions of the City of Port Arthur were not at hand. They are open to consideration on this hearing; therefore, the original opinion filed is withdrawn, and in lieu thereof the following is substituted:
Appellant was charged, tried and convicted in the Corporation Court of the City of Port Arthur of the offense of vagrancy and against her was assessed a fine of ten dollars.
Acting under the authority of Article 11, Section 5, of the Constitution, as that section read in 1911, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Altgelt v. GutzeitTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Turner v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. FallTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- McIntyre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Commellia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Commellia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Monsour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.