McBride v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The given and refused charges requested in writing by the defendant appear in the record, but the oral charge of the court does not appear. In the absence of this oral charge under Supreme Court rule 45, we will presume that the refused charges, where they state correct propositions of law, were covered by the court’s oral charge. Code 1923, § 9509; Cofield v. State, 18 Ala. App. 12, 88 So. 353; Bell v. Burns, 206 Ala. 465, 90 So. 491.
The foregoing does not'apply to the giving or refusing of the general affirmative charge. Where a defendant is entitled to general instructions to acquit under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bell v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Cofield v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Hammell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
- Dunning v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.