Legal Opinion

Coles-Moultrie Electric Cooperative v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 17, 1979No. 15416PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

The issue here: What does the term “locations” mean as used in the Electric Suppliers Act?

The Illinois Commerce Commission and Central Illinois Public Service Company appeal a decision of the circuit court in administrative review. The central question is which of two electric suppliers — Coles-Moultrie Electric Cooperative or CIPS — are entitled to render electrical services under the Electric Supplier Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. Ill 2/3, pars. 401-416) to 19 residences.

The Commission opted for CIPS.

The circuit court reversed.

The lower court was right.

We affirm.

The relevant facts are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western Illinois Electrical Coop. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re West River Elec. Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Coles-Moultrie Electric Cooperative v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Illinois Valley Electric Co-Operative, Inc. v. City of PrincetonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API