Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. Chase

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1903No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Petition by Perry P. Powers, auditor general, for the sale of land delinquent for taxes: On objections filed by Mary A. Chase. Prom a decree for petitioner, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an appeal from a decree directing the sale of lands for taxes. The tax objected to was a tax imposed upon defendant’s land for the paving of Saginaw street, in the city of Pontiac, in the year 1899. The objections set out in the pleadings are that the intention to make such pavement and expenditure was not set forth in the preceding annual appropriation bill; that no proper legal notice was given for a review of the special assessment; that the special assessments were not levied before the paving was commenced; that the change of grade and repaving of the street were not asked for by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Reilley v. . City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Auditor General v. MaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Branting v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Miller v. City of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Bowdich v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kelley v. MortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Sayles v. Board of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API