Fid. Sav. & Loan ass'n v. Citizens Tr. & Sav. Bank
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank R. Willis, Judge. Modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment. The complaint is voluminous but, in effect, it r sets forth a causeo of action against the defendant for damages for wrongfully, unlawfully, and oppressively seizing and holding possession of a hotel known as Hotel Schuyler, which was then a going concern and was then the property of the plaintiff. Judgment was given in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,503.59, which the court found the defendant had received from the patrons of the hotel during the time it was in possession thereof, and for an additional sum of five hundred dollars allowed as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tapscott v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casey v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Woodring v. Winner National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929