Legal Opinion

LaFavorite Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. H. Channon Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 12, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,082PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action of assumpsit for breach of contract. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant sued to recover for goods sold and delivered to appellee. The latter pleaded the general issue and filed an additional plea claiming a set-off for damages alleged to have been suffered by appellant’s breach of contract. 1 The contract consisted of a letter from appellee proposing terms for an arrangement by which the latter was to have the exclusive sale for five years, in certain specified territory, of all goods manufactured by appellant. ¡ The letter contains the signature of appellee, below which appears, “Accepted,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Peltz v. EicheleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Hall & Spencer v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Canadian Cordage & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  2. Illsley v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  3. Societe Marocaine Des Establissements P. Parrenin v. Gardner-Denver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API