Legal Opinion
Earl Smith v. Paul Lagana
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 21, 2014No. 13-2149UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Earl Smith appeals pro se from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this civil rights action. For the following reasons, we will affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Smith filed a civil rights complaint in the New Jersey Superior Court, Law Division, against three Department of Corrections (“DOC”) employees at Northern State Prison (“NSP”) who allegedly engaged in a “pattern of retaliation and harassment.” In particular, Smith alleged that the…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Robert Small v. WhittickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- BAKER v. CAMARILLODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BAKER v. CAMARILLODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- BAKER v. CAMARILLODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BOYKINS v. LANIGANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- CLAUSO v. MARTINELLIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.