Legal Opinion
Blood Bros. v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 9, 1980No. 78-544PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
We granted certiorari in this case to review the Court of Civil Appeals’ ruling that Regulation No. 44 of the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board Rules and Regulations is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse.
The facts of the case are sufficiently outlined in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals and the dissenting opinion of Justice Faulkner. In essence, the Court rejected Blood Brothers’ contention that the ABC Board could not lawfully regulate the type of conduct proscribed by Regulation No. 44 because it is protected by the First Amend*221ment to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hasson v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Little Caesar's, Inc. v. ALA. ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON. BD.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Little Caesar's, Inc. v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Ex Parte Little Caesar's, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Blood Bros. v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980