Legal Opinion

Lyerly v. American National Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 20, 2000No. 3259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge:

Ronald W. Lyerly brought this action to collect benefits under a crop insurance policy issued by American National Fire Insurance Company. The circuit court granted summary judgment to American National, finding Lyerly’s action was not timely filed in accordance with the terms of the policy. Lyerly appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1995, Lyerly purchased a Multiple Peril Crop Insurance policy from American National, a private insurer, to insure his tobacco crop against losses due to certain natural causes, including adverse weather, fire, and plant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Holman v. Laulo-Rowe AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Meyer v. ConlonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Williams Farms of Homestead, Inc. v. Rain & Hail Insurance ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Brown v. Crop Hail Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dailey v. American Growers InsuranceKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dailey v. American Growers InsuranceKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API