Legal Opinion

Heier v. Department of Corrections & Community Supervision

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

We confirm. Revocation of parole will be confirmed where *1019procedural requirements were followed and evidence, if credited, exists to support the determination (see Matter of Toomer v Warden of Adirondack Corr. Facility, 97 AD3d 868, 868 [2012]; Matter of Davis v New York State Bd. of Parole, 81 AD3d 1020, 1021 [2011]). Here, the marriage license, certificate of marriage and testimony of petitioner’s parole officer that petitioner never informed him of the relationship provide ample support for the determination. The fact that petitioner and his wife deny that any intimate relationship existed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API