Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Donbar Development Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 1, 1967No. 67-C-140PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ROSLING, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fisher in the above action [“Fisher action”] moves to consolidate it pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) with another action pending in this court entitled Winston v. Donbar Development Corp [“Donbar”]. Such latter action (Docket 64-C-169) is referred to herein as the “Winston action.”
Donbar is the sole defendant in both actions and in each is sued by a plaintiff on his claim for damages arising out of the alleged failure and refusal of Donbar to file a Registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 and to qualify its class B shares of capital stock…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Keep v. Indianapolis & St. Louis R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
3Cited by1 opinion
- Transeastern Shipping Corp. v. India Supply MissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971