Legal Opinion

People v. Gardner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 2004No. 1-03-1619PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE WOLFSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Clarence Gardner contends the trial court’s failure to ask or to allow his defense counsel to ask gang bias questions to prospective jurors deprived him of an impartial jury. To resolve the issue, we have to determine whether defense counsel actually requested gang bias questions and, if not, whether the trial court should have asked them anyway.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of first-degree murder under a theory of accountability and sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment. The judgment was affirmed on direct appeal.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. StrainIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cedell Davis v. Gregory Lambert, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. PearsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. People v. RinehartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People v. MacIasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API