Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2017No. 14CR05579; A159487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDER, S. J.

The state petitions for reconsideration in State v. Brown, 284 Or App 671, 393 P3d 274 (2017). In Brown, we held that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence without first weighing the risk of unfair prejudice against the probative value of that evidence, pursuant to OEC 403. Id. at 672. We reversed and remanded, explaining in our opinion that defendant was entitled to a new trial, consistent with the remedy dictated by our recent case law. Id. In doing so, we noted that the Oregon Supreme Court then had under advisement the question whether the appropriate remedy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Lawson/JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. BaughmanOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. AntonioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. AntonioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. SalsmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API