Legal Opinion

St. Patrick's Church Society of Corning v. Heermans

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover moneys paid under a mistake of fact.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On the 22d day of December, 1876, the village of Corning, H. Y., acting through its trustees, entered into a written contract with Harry C. Heermans and Thomas Lawrence, copartners, whereby it agreed to lease the Corning water works, with all appurtenances thereto belonging, owned by the municipality, to Heermans & Lawrence for a period of thirty years, from the 1st day of January, 1877, together with the right at all times within the life of said lease to lay water pipes and mains in any of the streets of Corning and to dig up the streets for laying such pipes, and giving to said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. People Ex Rel. Cairns v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. O'Connor v. . HendrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickman v. School District No. 62cOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dickman v. School District No. 62cOregon Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API