Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Schramm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1951No. 31565PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The controversy before the court arose out of the will and in the matter of the estate of Katie Bailey. The will was admitted to probate, and Marie Schramm, a daughter of decedent, was appointed executrix. Upon her death, Harry Schramm, her surviving husband, was appointed administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate.

At the time of the death of decedent, there existed three sayings accounts in the joint names of Katie Bailey and *720Henry J. Bailey, her husband, and three United States savings bonds of a maturity value of two hundred dollars. The bonds were payable to either…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Ivers' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schluneger v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sloans v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Peterson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Lula Sloans v. Nadine E. Berry And Robert M. BerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API