Legal Opinion

Odland v. Hamrick

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1944No. 9578PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LovinSj Judge:

This action was instituted by notice of motion for judgment against a maker and three indorsers of a promissory negotiable note. The trial court, a jury having been waived, heard the evidence, found that plaintiff did not own the note at the time the action was commenced, and that he had no property therein at the time of the trial sufficient to authorize a judgment in his favor, continued this action as to two defendants, entered a judgment of nil 'capiat as to the other two defendants, and adjudged that the latter recover costs. This writ of error was granted to review that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Clarke v. HogemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Mitchell v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Turner v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Roth v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sansom v. SansomWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Maryland Trust Co. v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API