Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Danziger

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1916No. Civ. No. 2066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff, the respondent here, sued appellant Danziger, E. A. Wiltsee, J. M. Kent, and the Lost Hills Syndicate, the latter being alleged to be, upon the information and belief of the plaintiff, a corporation. The suit was to recover $1,170.73 for services performed and money paid out on account of the defendants. Service was made upon this appellant and Kent, who answered in the case, and upon trial being had before a jury a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount prayed for, upon which verdict judgment was thereafter entered. This appeal is taken by Danziger from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norwood v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wisnom v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. People v. FreerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Rousseau v. HurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Lane v. McAlpineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API