Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fosmire v. Nicoleau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1989Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, J.

I am in complete agreement with my colleagues that the ex parte order issued by the Supreme Court must be vacated since it was issued without notice to or an opportunity to be heard by Mrs. Nicoleau or her representatives. As the Presiding Justice has stated, "a court in addressing an application to administer blood transfusions has *17a responsibility to undertake the delicate and sensitive task of balancing the express wishes of the patient with the identified competing State interests and should do so only after conducting the most extensive inquiry possible under the circumstances” (majority…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. In re EichnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Delio v. Westchester County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re MelideoNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Randolph v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API