Kruse v. Chester
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Ejectment for a parcel of land in the county of Kern. The defendants also filed a cross-complaint, which was answered by the plaintiff. The plaintiff had judgment for a portion of the premises sued for, and for the other portion judgment passed for defendants. A motion for a new trial made by defendants was denied, and this appeal is prosecuted by defendants from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.
The statement was properly settled and allowed, and the motion to strike out is denied.
There was no abuse of discretion in allowing, at the trial, plaintiff to amend his answer to the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- City of Santa Ana v. BallardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899