Marine Nat. Exchange Bank of Milwaukee v. Kalt-Zimmers Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1DissentSparks, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
_ . Two questions are involved m this appeal: Were the bonds negotiable instara-meats, and were the banks holders m due course? A negative answer to either question would prevent the banks’ recovery and sustain the decision of the Distinct Court.
In August, 1929, Kalt-Zimmers, a rnanufacturing concern located in Milwaukee, ex-eeuted and delivered to the Haekett firm, a Wisconsin corporation, as trustee, a deed of trust conveying certain of its property as seeurity for a bond issue of $115,000. The bonds contained the following provision:
“Said bonds are issued…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Duncan v. JaudonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- First National Bank of Paterson v. National Broadway BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rothenberg v. SilbermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Southern United Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935