Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marine Nat. Exchange Bank of Milwaukee v. Kalt-Zimmers Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 18, 1934No. 5048PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentSparks, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

_ . Two questions are involved m this appeal: Were the bonds negotiable instara-meats, and were the banks holders m due course? A negative answer to either question would prevent the banks’ recovery and sustain the decision of the Distinct Court.

In August, 1929, Kalt-Zimmers, a rnanufacturing concern located in Milwaukee, ex-eeuted and delivered to the Haekett firm, a Wisconsin corporation, as trustee, a deed of trust conveying certain of its property as seeurity for a bond issue of $115,000. The bonds contained the following provision:

“Said bonds are issued…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Duncan v. JaudonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. First National Bank of Paterson v. National Broadway BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rothenberg v. SilbermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Southern United Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API