Legal Opinion

Donnell v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1982No. 45 Miscellaneous Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Opinion,

Richard Donnell has filed a complaint in mandamus, which we will treat as a petition for review, alleging that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole violated its own regulations and the petitioner’s due process rights when it recommitted him to Roekview State Correctional Facility as a technical and convicted parole violator.

After the board filed a certificate from the board’s chairman, to which Mr. Donnell replied, and an amended answer with new matter, both parties filed motions for summary judgment. On motions for summary judgment, we review the pleadings in the light most…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Leach v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Wolgemuth v. KleinfelterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Harris v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies v. Argonaut InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Gartner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Simpson v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Hughes v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Weissman v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API