Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Barberino Brothers, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 31, 2001No. CIV. 3:00CV2172 (AHN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND TO COMPEL

FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a Truth In Lending Act violation case arising out of two consumer credit transactions with defendant Barberino Brothers, Inc. for the purchase of two cars by plaintiffs.1 Pending are plaintiffs’ Motions for Sanctions and to Compel [Doc. ## 18, 24], seeking costs and attorneys fees incurred at the Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) deposition of defendant’s designee, Manny Gonzalez, and incurred in bringing this motion. Plaintiff further seeks an order of the court compelling Mr. Gonzalez to answer the same set…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  2. Applera Corp. v. MJ Research Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API