Legal Opinion

Rosales v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 26, 2011No. 04-09-00498-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Christopher Rosales of the murder of Juan Flores. In three points of error, Rosales contends: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction; (2) the evidence is factually insufficient to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court erred in admitting his oral statement. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Background

Cristo Rubio was on his postal delivery route when he noticed Juan Flores’s video store was not open as it usually was at that time. Rubio testified Matthew Gravlin was outside the store…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Poindexter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valdez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  2. Juan A. Valdez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. Kenneth Shaye Ervin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  4. Nicanor Hernandez III A/K/A "Little Nick" v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Sam Autry Fletcher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API