Legal Opinion

R.D.S.M. v. Intake Officer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1977No. 2821PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., RABINO-WITZ, CONNOR and BURKE, JJ., and DIMOND, J. Pro Tern. BURKE, Justice.

This appeal concerns the right of a child to a “speedy trial” following the filing of a petition alleging that he is a delinquent.

On May 14,1975, Patrick Aloia, a juvenile intake officer, filed a petition in the superi- or court alleging that R.D.S.M., appellant, had aided and abetted in the theft of a motorcycle on May 12,1975, an act bringing him within the provisions of AS 47.10.-010(a)(1), 1 and, if proven, the minor could be adjudged a delinquent minor. 2 Patrick Murphy, R.D.S.M.’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Serna v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  4. Berryman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Knowlton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API