Legal Opinion

Z.R.L. Corp. v. Great Central Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 7, 1990No. 1-89-0395PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scarjano

Plaintiffs (collectively, ZRL) were sued in Federal court for violations of the Federal civil rights statutes. During the pendency of the Federal lawsuit, ZRL sought a State court declaratory judgment that defendant insurers (collectively, Great Central) were obligated to defend the Federal action. After prevailing on a motion for summary judgment regarding the coverage issue, ZRL later obtained a nunc pro tunc order requiring that Great Central pay attorney fees incurred in prosecuting the declaratory judgment action. Great Central appeals the order relating to attorney fees. We reverse.

Prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fox v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. RosenwaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dauderman v. DaudermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Gill v. GillIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Z.R.L. Corp. v. Great Central InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jill Knowles Enterprises, Inc v. DunkinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co. v. Drake International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Jill Knowles Enterprises, Inc v. DunkinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Old Second National Bank, N.A. v. KarolewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. IvicicAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API