Dodd v. Succession of Orillion

The only question presented by this case is whether certain property admitted to have been the paraphernal property of the plaintiff, Lavinia Dodd, was retained under her administration, or was administered cither by her husband alone, or her husband and herself indifferently, during the community between them.

In the latter case the revenues of the property would, of course, fall into the community. C. C. 2363, 2371.

*69If she retained the administration, the fruits were paraphernal; and so the District Judge decreed them to he.

The property in question consisted of an interest of three-eighths in…