Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Farms

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2000No. 00-1691PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Robert Hattum and Hattum Family Farms performed custom farmwork for the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe on tribal land. The Tribe brought a qui tarn action against Hattum, seeking to set aside certain crop liens, to require an accounting of payments Hattum received from the Tribe, and to recover for damages to tribal land. In a counterclaim, Hattum sought damages for unpaid salaries, amounts due under the farming agreements, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract. The district court partially granted the Tribe’s motion for summary judgment, concluding the contracts were void under 25 U.S.C. § 81…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Ex. Rel. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Hattum Family FarmsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America, Ex Rel Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, Doing Business as Crow Creek Farm Enterprises Dacotah Farms Crow Creek Farms William Shields, Jr., a Member of the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, Individually v. Hattum Family Farms Hattum Custom Farms Robert HattumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API