Legal Opinion

Moser v. York Cloak & Suit Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1920Published

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

This suit is brought upon three causes of action. Upon the first for $368, defendant conceded plaintiffs ’ right to recover. The second for $632 was for defendant’s breach in certain respects of a contract to be presently mentioned as to which it is quite evident, as recognized by both parties, that the jury found in defendant’s favor. It is, therefore, not involved in the- present appeal. The third cause of action was for the sum of $1,000, sought to be recovered under the following circumstances:

On July 10th, 1919, the respective parties hereto entered into a contract in which the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayer v. . McCreeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Petze v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Hopedale Electric Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Hopedale Electric Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Hopedale Electric Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API