People v. Salazar
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions of second degree burglary and third degree criminal trespass. He asserts that he was coerced into waiving his right to testify in his own defense by the trial court’s erroneous ruling that a statement given by him, although suppressed as violative of his Miranda rights, could be introduced to impeach his testimony. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
On October 14, 1977, defendant was apprehended as a suspect in a burglary. He was taken to the police station where he made a statement. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the statement on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. ParadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- People v. HenrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CasperColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. EvansColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ApodacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. Gonzales-QuevedoColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. RexColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.