Sayler v. City of Durham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant City appeals from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, finding that the City lacks standing to enforce a “Buffer and Landscape Easement” contained in the recorded plat of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved by the City. We reverse.
Most of the facts are undisputed. A land developer applied to the City for approval of a PUD. The City gave preliminary approval subject to a number of conditions, including that the PUD contain a 40-foot wide buffer area of natural vegetation between one side of the PUD and Boones Ferry Road. The developer complied with this condition by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Lane County v. Oregon Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Montmore Homeowners Ass'n v. BrydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Village of Los Ranchos De Albuquerque v. ShiveleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. EachusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991