Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 6, 2011No. Nos. SC 91173, SC 91182, SC 91214, SC 91429PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Four appeals have been consolidated1 because each involves the issue of whether evidence obtained in a search of a motor vehicle incident to a traffic arrest is admissible. The defendants were secured at the time of search, and there was no reason to believe that evidence of the crime for which each defendant was arrested was in any of their vehicles. The searches were performed in compliance with binding appellate precedent. New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 460, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); State v. Harvey 648 S.W.2d 87, 89-90 (Mo. banc 1988). However, while…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. State of Missouri v. Charles A. Selvy, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State of Missouri v. Derrick L. CarrawellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. State v. FeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API