Legal Opinion

Ex parte Cardenas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 2018No. NUMBER 13–17–00424–CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Justice Rodriguez

In prosecutions for capital murder, first-degree felony aggravated sexual assault, and first-degree felony burglary of a habitation with intent to commit a robbery, appellant Isaiah Cardenas, who was younger than eighteen years old at the time of the offenses, appeals from an order setting his pretrial bond. By two issues, Cardenas contends: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in setting his pretrial bond at $750,000; and (2) the trial court improperly considered hearsay evidence. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Arrest Warrant

On June 13, 2017, an arrest warrant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RubacCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ex Parte VasquezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Ex Parte HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Ex Parte Beard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Damien Gabriel Garza v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024
  2. Ex Parte Adam Matthew Hammond, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
  3. Ex Parte Christopher Riggins v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
  4. Ex Parte Corey D. James v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
  5. Ex Parte Corey D. James v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API