Legal Opinion

Bright v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William O’Brien, III, J.), entered February 13, 2000, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on damages for past and future pain and suffering unless defendant stipulates to an award of $360,000 for past pain and suffering and $300,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court’s decision to grant a new trial constituted a provident exercise of its discretion (see, Yalkut v City of New York, 162 AD2d 185, 188; Annunziata v Colasanti, 126 AD2d 75, 80). Given the ample and virtually uncontroverted evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yalkut v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Annunziata v. ColasantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Silver v. Tops Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gayle v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Seay v. GreenidgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API