Crawford v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawes, Justice.
On the trial of a habeas corpus case, the judge is the trior of both the law and the facts, and his decision on issues of fact, if supported by any evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal. Ballard v. Smith, 225 Ga. 416 (1) (169 SE2d 329); Anglin v. Caldwell, 227 Ga. 584 (182 SE2d 120); Nelson v. Smith, 228 Ga. 117 (2) (184 SE2d 150). Where, as in this case, a habeas corpus petitioner bases his complaint upon the contention that at the time he decided to plead guilty to the offense set forth in the indictment under which he was sentenced, he did so under coercion which arose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ballard v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Nelson v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Anglin v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Galbreath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Phillips v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Zant v. WentworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982