Apollo Stationery Co. v. Pilmar
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMobbis E. Spegtob, J.
Motion for a temporary injunction is denied and the stay vacated. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin a former employee and others from soliciting its customers or doing any business with them, alleging that defendant Pilmer has obtained a listing of its customers in an improper manner and for the purpose of competing with it.
Plaintiff’s citations are clearly distinguishable from the present case, for example; In Conviser v. Brownstone & Co. (209 App. Div. 584) the defendant used a list of plaintiff’s customers dishonestly obtained by defendant from one of plaintiff’s employees ; in Duane Jones Co. v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Conviser v. J. C. Brownstone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tempo Instrument, Inc. v. Logitek, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
- Northern States Power Co. v. North Dakota Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Apollo Stationery Co. v. PilmarNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Haggerty v. Burkey Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
- Rudiger v. KenyonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.