Legal Opinion

Schumaker v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 21, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

This original action was filed in this Court in which petitioner contends his constitutional rights have been violated, in that, the respondent in the judgment provided that his sentence should run consecutively with a judgment theretofore entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court. The petitioner contends that under RCr 11.04 the respondent had no such authority. RCr 11.04 provides :

“A judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea, the verdict or findings, the adjudication and sentence, a statement as to whether the defendant is entitled to bail, the amount of bail and the day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Delk v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McBride v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API