Legal Opinion

Shadbolt & Boyd v. Findeisen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 17, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Debt, on a foreign judgment. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

This was., a suit brought by plaintiffs in error on an Iowa judgment in their favor against the defendant in error. The recovery below was for only a nominal sum and costs.

Much complaint is made because the Circuit Court denied the plaintiffs the right to open and close the arguments to the jury. The general rule is that the party holding the affirmative of the issue, has the right not only to open and close the evidence but the arguments to the jury also, and the right is regarded as a substantial one and should always be treated as such. Elliott’s General Practice, Sec. 533, et seq.; Harvey…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Razor v. RazorIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Colwell v. BrowerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Carpenter v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  5. Hettinger v. BeilerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nagle v. SchnadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API