Griffin v. Pugh
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Fourth District Court. cited 5 N. ¥. 417 ; 17 Mass. 606 ; 5 Gray, 306 ; 7 Gray, 158 ; 8 Gray, 159 ; Sto. on Sales, § 313; 2 Kent, 768-9; 3 Cush. 575; 1 Pars, on Cont. 537, and notes. cited 2 Hill. 325; 8 Gray, 159 ; 3 Gray, 545; Sto. on Oont. § 849, c.
1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge
This is an action of replevin for a steam boiler, etc. The defendant purchased the property in dispute of the firm of Martin, Law-«& Wimbsy, who were at the time in possession, under a claim of title from the plaintiff as their vendor. The title of *327Martin & Co. rested upon a contract in writing between them and plaintiff, dated October 23, 1861, as follows : “ This agreement entered into between Wm. Griffin, of the first part, and G. Thomas Martin, etc., of the second part, viz: the party of the first part agreed to sell the parties of the second part an engine, etc., for the sum of $250,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parmlee v. CatherwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Sumner v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Skinner v. OakesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- Defiance Machine Works v. TrislerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.